Doug Buenz
Real Estate Broker
Alain Pinel Realtors
(925) 463-2000
I am a local Real Estate Broker with
Alain Pinel Realtors serving the
Pleasanton and the Tri-Valley
area. I am an avid watcher of the
local real estate market, as well as
cultural and political events.
But that is what I do, not who I am... » read more
Real Estate Q & A
Unreasonable buyers asking for more money from Seller
I entered into a contract to sell my house a couple of weeks ago. Because the market is slow, I ended up taking a lot less for my house than I was planning on. Now the buyers have had inspections, and they want me to credit them $3500 for repairs, most of which are complete B.S. I am really mad about this. Should I tell them to take a hike? Fred W.
Fred, take a deep breath and relax. In some ways this market can be called "Revenge of the Buyers". Remember 4 or 5 years ago when Sellers told buyers things like "take it or leave it" or "don't ask for anything to be fixed... we have 2 other buyers who want it". Now the tables have turned. Don't get hung up on the details of what the buyer wants. Some may be legit, and some might be categorized as outright extortion. But so what. If you want to sell you house, swallow hard and sign it. If you think you can do better in this market, tell them no. It is really that simple. But tread carefully, because working with buyers today is a little like trying to feed a squirrel. They don't really trust you, they are skittish, and at the first sign of trouble they go scampering for the woods. If you refuse the $3500, it could end up costing you $5000, $10,000, or even $20,000 more to get the next buyer in contract.
Stubborn Seller Won't Move Out?
I am buying a house in Pleasanton, and the contract is signed and the escrow is getting ready to close, and the seller decides he does not want to move out at close of escrow, but wants a week after close to move out. When we express the fact that this will not work for us, he threatens to cancel the contract. Can he do this? Ben in Pleasanton
Ben, I have good news and not so good news. The good news is that no, the seller can not unilaterally cancel a ratified contract just because he doesn't get his way. If all contingencies are removed and you are coming down to the wire, the seller can't arbitrarily start changing the terms. And he certainly can not cancel a contract. Real estate contracts are bilateral. they require the agreement of both the buyer and seller. If he attempted to cancel the contract, you could likely tie up his property so he could not sell it to someone else, and take him to court to force him to sell to you under the terms of the contract. That is the good news. The not so good news is that this course of action is time consuming, emotionally draining, and costly. If the seller becomes difficult to deal with, try to relax and work around him if you really want the house. You can always take him to small claims court after the close to recoup any out of pocket expenses you incur. Unfortunately, there is virtually no protection in a contract for an obstinant seller. You can either put up with him as best you can, and then seek renumeration in small claims court, or threaten him back, but it is difficult if not impossible to physically force the seller out of the premises. As always, consult an attorney about the specifics of your case.
Confusion on Commission Agreement?
Doug, my friend listed her house with an agent with the understanding that if one of her friends (named specifically) buys her property, the agent would be compensated at 4% commission. So one of her friends has made an offer. When the agent sent my friend the estimated pay out from the transaction, the agent put in her commission as 6%. Her explanation is that the original deal was only good until she listed the house in MLS. Is this ethical? Or legal? Or standard practice? Ginny C.
Ginny, that is a great question. As is often the case, the devil is in the details. Any agreement involving the sale or transfer or brokerage of real estate in California must be in writing to be enforceable. So if there was no written clause regarding the friend, then your friends are out of luck. So is it legal? I think a better question is the agent legally entitled to the 6%. Based on what you have described, the answer is yes, since there obviously is no written agreement regarding this situation. Is this ethical? I always have a problem with any party that does not honor the spirit of an agreement, even if the details are not specifically spelled out. But keep in mind that neither you nor I heard what was actually said. Again, this is why all agreements dealing with real estate must be in writing. I this standard practice? Again, I am not sure what you are referring to, but if there is an exception or exclusion to the commission agreement for one party, there normally is a time limit during which the party must act. Whether or not that was clearly stated in writing, or clearly explained, is a matter of conjecture at this point. The lesson here is to always get agreements in writing, especially if they are modifications to standard agreements.
This is primarily a blog devoted to real estate and lifestyle issues in Pleasanton and the Tri-Valley, and in general I avoid discussing politics. But one observation I have made over time is that voters often are attracted to the personality and the idea of what a certain candidate represents, while having little or no knowledge about what their favorite candidate actually stands for. My mom, for example, is an Irish Catholic who was raised in the great depression. She is a card carrying Democrat come hell or high water, mostly because that’s the way most Irish voted at that time, and because of her fondness for Roosevelt and the New Deal. However, much has changed since the 1930’s, and yet she clings to the label “democrat” like Brittany Spears clings to celebrity. But if I ask her about specific issues, her responses are typically more conservative than liberal…. but she remains a tried and true “democrat”.
Here is a link to a short questionnaire about several important political issues. When you answer the questions about your feelings on these various issues, the survey tallies your answers and shows how your answers compare to all of the candidates’ actual stance on the same issues. This is the greatest thing since Al Gore invented the internet, because it removes the “rock star” persona and slick political messages that most people are attracted to, and instead focuses on what the candidate actually stands for, and how that compares to your personal beliefs. The results are very interesting to say the least. It shows you which issues you have in common with each candidate, and on which issues you differ. It is a fun exercise. Give it a try (courtesy WQAD in Iowa)
Loading ...
RSS
Who are you going to vote for? Are you sure?